Sunday Times Reading: Convergence & Millennials<< Why Humans Are Better than Robots, Part XXXIII | Main | Can Nielsen Really Have Only 60 DVRs in its Panel??? >> David Card | January 22, 2006, 01:23 PM Regular readers know I occasionally mock the NY Times, especially for its Internet coverage -- you only hurt the ones you love -- but today it features not one but two sensible, interesting stories on new media. Under an execrable headline, Richard Siklos profiles with the appropriate skepticism two companies at the forefront of what defines convergence these days. Decisionmark is trying to help local stations impose themselves on Internet TV. Warning: potential DRM "lock down 20th century business models" disaster looming. Meanwhile, startup Spot Runner is offering a very low-end -- but also low-cost -- spot TV ad network. (Google, Bueller, anyone?) But how much inventory do they have? Tom Zeller, jr., goes a bit overboard on the media habits of millennials (doesn't he know anyone who's not in media or marketing to interview?). But there are lots of good nuggets, and more proof that the 18-49 audience is a media crutch that itself can be crippling. A crisp explanation of demographic reality:
Good sense from a market researcher:
"What's hard to measure, and what we're trying to measure," Mr. McKenzie continued, "is the impact of groupthink, of group mentality, and the tendency of what we might call the democratization of social interaction and how that changes this generation's relationship with almost everything they come in contact with." And this should help define what modern media companies do:
Somebody has to create what everyone talks about. And facilitate the talking. |
|
