<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>David Card</title>
    <link>http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
     <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:52:34 -05:00</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:30:55 -05:00</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.121</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>

    <item>
      <title>Going Green, Embracing the Groundswell, etc, First Take</title>
      <link>http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/archives/2008/08/going_green_emb.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/riley/">Emily</a> calls it <a href="http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/riley/archives/2008/08/going_corporate.html">going corporate</a>. <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/">Jeremiah</a> calls it a <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/08/27/mashing-forrester-and-jupiter/">mash-up</a>. Irregahdless, as I think they say in Southie, what it means is putting together the two best teams in social media-marketing-computing research. And you know, even to this old cynic, it's already feeling like a team. (That whole Cambridge-Manhattan thing is muted by California and Europe and all the leftover New Englanders at Jupiter....)</p>

<p>Some early observations:</p>

<p>Boy, do they have a lot of process. (Refreshingly, it's aligned with corporate and client objectives.)</p>

<p>They brainstorm just like we do: Way too many random whiteboard pattern-matching exercises!</p>

<p>In all seriousness, just for an example of what we should be able to do combined that we couldn't do apart: Earlier this year, <a href="http://www.jupiterresearch.com/bin/item.pl/company:analyst/jup/id=4221/">Corina Matiesanu</a> and I tried to build a model based on analyzing historical survey trends to project what interactive behaviors are generational versus age- or lifestage-based. We took a good college try, but our data wasn't deep enough to pull it off. I think Forrester's is, and I am looking forward to take another shot.</p>

<p>This should be fun.</p>

<p><img alt="coverbuynow.jpg" src="http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/archives/coverbuynow.jpg" width="271" height="326" /></p>

<p>(Sadly, my HTML skills are not such that I can make the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Groundswell-Winning-Transformed-Social-Technologies/dp/B001B1FDM2/ref=ed_oe_k">order now</a> flash a one-click purchase option.)</p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10162@http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:52:34 -05:00</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Needs to be Covered at the Olympics</title>
      <link>http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/archives/2008/08/what_needs_to_b.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>D@mn, how did I miss this? I am now a fan of Icelandic handball, regardless of whether handball should be an Olympic sport or not.</p>

<p>First, we have <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog/2008/08/icelandic_handball_magic_elves.html ">sharks and Brennivin</a>:</p>

<ul><em>The seafood-related alcohol beverage. "When we eat the shark we drink this Brennivin," Sigfus Sigurdsson said, referring to the Icelandic caraway-flavored schnapps that is sometimes called "Black Death." 

<p>"You put it in the freezer for a few weeks so the liquid becomes real thick," he continued, "and then the way you work the shark you can't describe it, but it smells awful." </p>

<p>But it tastes good, right? "No," Gudjon Sigurdsson said with a laugh. "But you have to do it. That's just the way it is." </em></ul></p>

<p>And then, we have the existentialism flavored with mysticism:</p>

<ul><em>So yeah, the captain of the Icelandic men's handball team has a degree in humanities, once considered entering a Buddhist monastery, has read many of the French 20th century deconstructionists and deep thinkers (such as Félix Guattari and Gilles Deleuze), refers to himself as an existentialist ("it gives you anguish, yes; basically existentialism is to say it doesn't matter whether God lives or he doesn't, you create your own life, and by doing that you make an example for others"), speaks of quantum physics, has read Karen Armstrong's works on mythology, and chose for his Olympic reading "Man Without Qualities," the three-part novel by the Austrian author and essayist Robert Musil.

<p>And magic elves?</p>

<p>"It's not so much a matter of 'believing' in the regular sense of the word, it's more of enjoying the possibility of it actually existing," he said. "And it doesn't matter whether somebody judges you or not for having that possibility in your mind, because it's a funny possibility and it enlightens your life and makes it more colorful."</em></ul></p>

<p>How could you not love these guys?</p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10147@http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:56:37 -05:00</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What th-? Part II</title>
      <link>http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/archives/2008/08/what_th_part_ii.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Uh, why does the FiOS installation guy in the TV ad hold a Kindle posing as a digital notepad? Stoopid product placement? Hints at future products? In-joke? Or just ad hoc substitution by a prop guy?</p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10138@http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:36:46 -05:00</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What th-?</title>
      <link>http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/archives/2008/08/what_th.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Potter fans are not <a href="http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org/2008/8/14/half-blood-prince-movie-pushed-to-july-2009">amused</a>.</p>

<p><em>The sixth Harry Potter film, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, originally scheduled for a November 21 release, has now been moved to July 17, 2009 in the US and major international markets</em></p>

<p>Warners claims it's because the writers' strike threw off the skeds for other potentially big openers. Does that mean it needs Potter to <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117990557.html?categoryid=13&cs=1">save</a> 2009, after 2008 got the surprise benefit of a bigger-than-expected Bats? Or does Potter 6 need major re-work? Furious fans want to know...</p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10137@http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:22:54 -05:00</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Efficiency, Hollywood Style</title>
      <link>http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/archives/2008/08/efficiency_holl.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I guess if you already know a <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i84d286596a535ecf154a2af8d3c57242">movie script</a> is going to be crappy and require dozens of re-writes from multiple teams of writers who don't talk to each other, it makes sense to get to it earlier rather than later:</p>

<p><em>"We all want this movie to go into production as soon as possible," (Paradox Entertainment president and CEO Fredrik) Malmberg (who's producing the Conan re-make) said. "It's a fast-tracked movie. Lionsgate felt the process was enhanced by having a second team come in and do a script."</em></p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10135@http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:57:32 -05:00</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Play Ball!</title>
      <link>http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/archives/2008/08/play_ball.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Must-read <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121855949787833751.html?mod=hps_us_editors_picks">interview </a>in the Journal with MLB.com ceo Bob Bowman. On the state of mobile sports content for now:</p>

<ul><em>People don't look at their phone for very long. It's about 30 seconds. And that's how people are used to enjoying non-voice content on their wireless devices. For a live baseball game, I'd rather get five updates from five games rather than watch two minutes of a baseball game. That may change as quality gets better, as the pipe gets better, as all of these things get better, as screens get more robust. But right now, that's where it is.</em></ul>

<p>MLB.com is one of the rare <a href="http://www.jupiterresearch.com/bin/item.pl/research:concept_print/63/id=100035/">successes </a>in online paid content, though a ton of its revenues come from ticketing. Oh, and he says he won't sue his fans.</p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10134@http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:24:42 -05:00</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Paper Planes and Pineapples</title>
      <link>http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/archives/2008/08/paper_planes_an.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This morning, M.I.A.'s "Paper Planes," previously a non-hit from a year-old album, was (<a href="http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2008/07/29/m_i_a_s_paper_planes_featured_in_trailer">still</a>) number two on the iTunes singles list. (Not on Amazon.) It's featured in the trailer for the stoner flick "Pineapple Express." Whatever it takes. Five years ago, fans would have had a hard time buying a single of a song from a movie. See, music industry, digital isn't <em>all </em>bad...</p>

<p><a href="http://www.rhapsody.com/goto?rcid=tra.15886588&variant=play&lsrc=RN_htm"><img src="http://static.realone.com/rotw/images/buttons/playsm.gif" width="20" height="20" border="0"> Paper Planes by M.I.A.</a></p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10129@http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:01:12 -05:00</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Social Segmentation, Part XIII</title>
      <link>http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/archives/2008/08/social_segmenta.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm not sure more is better when it comes to creating customer segmentation analysis based on social media activities and attitudes. Still, the virtual discussion is fruitful, and it makes me think about demographics vs. psychographics vs. generational schemes. And to wonder how much the models we create now will have to evolve in the future.</p>

<p>I'm a little late to Gartner's <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=721008">social marketing party</a>, but (new) colleague <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/">Jeremiah Owyang</a> tweaked me to <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/08/11/understanding-gartners-generation-virtual/">it</a>. Gartner analyst Adam Sarner goes into a little more detail in this Forbes <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/04/30/genv-gartner-marketing-oped-cx_asa_0430genv.html">column</a>.</p>

<p>Gartner calls its system a generation, but disavows age and other demographics. (And predicts more marketing spending online than off- in ten years.) Whatever. Jupiter, Forrester and most marketers and programmers I know still think a lot about demographics. Still, I'm partial to a more "psycho" approach -- I've been convinced over the years that attitudes and experiences are highly predictive of future behavior. And I've been working on Millennials analysis as well. </p>

<p>But the coolest bit of the Gartner approach, at least as it's laid out in the column, is the idea that since people have multiple personae online, marketers and programmers need to match up with those, rather than with the individual behind them. </p>

<p>I wonder if social media behavior aligns more with generation, with brands, or with activities. Do you update your Facebook status, but never post reviews? Or do you review movies on Flixster but not on Amazon? Or search for books the same way you search for movies, let alone healthcare products? </p>

<p>Modal, contextual personae. Now that's a segmentation that'll generate consulting $$ and agency fees for years to come....</p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10126@http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:14:29 -05:00</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Google a Media Company?</title>
      <link>http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/archives/2008/08/is_google_a_med.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The NY Times asks, "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/11/technology/11google.html?pagewanted=all">Is Google a Media Company?</a>" Of course it is. It makes its money from advertising. The Times is actually asking a deeper question about Google's own properties competing with more traditional online media for your eyeballs and time, and what its role as the dominant search engine means in that context. Check it out; it's a thoughtful piece. </p>

<p>Some relevant Jupiter reports on living in Google's world:<br />
<a href="http://www.jupiterresearch.com/bin/item.pl/research:concept_print/63/id=100403/">Living with Portals</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jupiterresearch.com/bin/item.pl/research:vision_print/63/id=99951/">Herding the Cats</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jupiterresearch.com/bin/item.pl/research:vision_print/63/id=98977/">21st Century Portals</a><br />
and the perennial <a href="http://www.jupiterresearch.com/bin/item.pl/research:concept_print/63/id=97129/">Understanding Google</a> (I <em>think</em> that one still has some utility, though it's getting hoary)</p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10125@http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:34:22 -05:00</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Q2 Online Advertising Scoreboard</title>
      <link>http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/archives/2008/08/q2_online_adver.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For those of you keeping score, a roundup of Q2 online ad revenues:</p>

<p>- <strong>Google</strong>. Own sites up 42% to $3.5 billion. Network up 22% to $1.7 billion. International outgrew US and is over half of Google's total for the first time.<br />
- <strong>Yahoo</strong>. Own sites up 14% to $1 billion. Network down 4% to $570 million<br />
- <strong>MSN</strong>. Up 18% to $618 million, but not all that growth is organic. Some of it's from acquisitions. And it was Microsoft's fiscal fourth quarter, so they had feet on the gas.<br />
- <strong>AOL </strong>up 2% to <strike>about $600</strike> $530 million (more detail after the earnings call). UPDATED AOL's display ad sales on its own properties were down 14% to $191 million. Search was up 10% to $172 million and its third-party network up 15% to $167 million.<br />
- <strong>Fox Interactive Media</strong> - which is mostly MySpace - up 23% to $225 million.</p>

<p>New York Times Digital was up 18%; Martha Stewart up 31%, Washington Post up 4% but display was up 11%. Disney and Viacom didn't say much, so presumably they had some growth but not high double digits.</p>

<p>Jupiter's forecast for 2008 US online display ad spending growth of 15% to 16% is achievable, but it'll take some strong second half kicks.</p>]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10115@http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/card/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:52:54 -05:00</pubDate>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>