Gary Stein - Tiger's Nike Shot as ad: what on earth are you people talking about?!


<< Google Video Upload Beta is live | Main | Death of Desktop PCs are Greatly Exaggerated >>

Michael Gartenberg | April 13, 2005, 06:36 PM

Gary nails it. Why on earth would you want to go backward and make this a TV commercial?

First: Tiger Woods makes this incredible shot. That's cool. And it ends up that the Nike logo is very clearly visible throughout the whole thing. Then: Joe Jaffe puts together the shot as a 30 second spot. People think its cool. Now: There's this groundswell of support for Nike's agency to turn this into a regular ad and put it out there on broadcast. What?!

This is an example of why product-placement and sponsorship works, often better than TV ads. This was a success for a new way of thinking about advertising. And yet, the popular opinion seems to be that this magic moment should, instead, be pushed back into a 30 second spot! Is this the same group of of people celebrating the end of broadcast as we know it? I think this just demonstrates how deeply engrained the accepted structures of advertising are: we think in 30 second spots...even those of us who believe that the format is a dinosaur. [Gary Stein]



 
Subscribe for free JupiterResearch email updates: