Microsoft Monitor Weblog A Jupiter Research Business Weblog
 
Jupiter's Microsoft Monitor Research Service helps vendors prepare for market opportunities created by new Microsoft initiatives. In addition, Microsoft Monitor helps business and enterprise users discover which strategies are most successful in dealing with Microsoft and how to best exploit the customer relationship. The Microsoft Monitor Weblog is a companion to Jupiter's Microsoft Monitor Research Service and provides additional news, analysis and insight relevant to the areas most important for Microsoft's growth in both the business and consumer marketplaces. The content on this Weblog is often based on late-breaking events whose sources are deemed to be reliable. The insight and recommendations represent Jupiter's initial analysis. As a result, our positions are subject to refinements or major changes as Jupiter analysts gather more information and perform further analysis. Feedback is welcome at mm@jupitermedia.com.

Contact Us
More information about Jupiter's Microsoft Monitor Research service is available by contacting Kieran Kelly at researchsales@jupitermedia.com or by telephone at 1-800-481-1212

Blogroll
David Card
Michael Gartenberg
Alan Meckler
David Schatsky

September 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
Archives
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003

Recent Entries
My PDC Post Morteum
Microsoft Office, the Server Edition, Part Two
Windows Workflow Foundation and Expression
PDC: The Big Day
Windows Vista Sleeper Announcements

August 01, 2003
Office Live Jive

Microsoft needs to take a step back and rethink its product-naming strategy. The company changes product names too frequently, which has got to confuse the hell out of some customers. I can barely keep up, and I closely watch the company.

Consider that Windows Server 2003 had four different names before the product officially launched. Four! Some other recent changes: Pocket PC got a June makeover to Windows Powered 2003. In March, Microsoft changed SharePoint Team Services to Windows SharePoint Services. The change did little to diminish brand confusion with SharePoint Portal Server, a completely different product sans the name. SharePoint Portal Server has had its own rebranding/name change to Office SharePoint Portal Server 2003. Renaming products has been a popular 2003 activity, also affecting other Office and Windows Server products, among others.

That said, Microsoft really has a problem in the messaging and online collaboration space, at least when it comes to renaming and rebranding. On May 27, the company announced that the new messaging program codenamed Greenwich would become Office Real-Time Communications Server 2003. That was after an April announcement making Greenwich the Real-Time Communications Server 2003. The May change added “Office” to the name and positioned the product as part of the Office System family of products.

Less than two months later, Microsoft changed the name yet again to Office Live Communications Server 2003. So, that works out to three names since April. Since Microsoft hasn’t shipped Live Communications Server yet, the company still has time to match Windows Server 2003’s renaming record.

I can understand some of Microsoft’s likely reasoning for the second name change. In April, the software giant completed its acquisition of online collaboration software and service provider PlaceWare. In July, Microsoft changed that product’s name to Office Live Meeting 2003. From one perspective, it makes sense that Microsoft would want to similarly brand its collaboration and messaging products. Of course, the change effectively kills any brand equity built up by PlaceWare.

For a company the size of Microsoft, which during fiscal 2004 will spend $6.8 billion on research and development, it’s pretty reasonable to expect some serious thinking about product names before announcing them. These frequent name changes suggest product strategies are in constant flux, which may not be the best way to install confidence in larger customers looking for software stability over long periods.

I suppose the strategy makes sense if the goal is customer confusion, but that generally has not been the sharpest way to win customers to products, particularly new ones like Live Communications Server. My advice to Microsoft: Be smart. Work out product names and branding before announcing them, and then stick with them--at least for more than a couple of months. :)

Posted by Joe Wilcox at August 01, 2003 10:51 AM






































Copyright 2004 Jupitermedia Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, & Permissions, Privacy Policy.